Click
an area of the map for world news.


Affiliated Programs: 



World Press Review is a program of the Stanley Foundation.
|

A U.S.
Boycott Must Not Stop this Show
Editorial, City
Press (keyed to black South African market), Johannesburg,
Aug. 12, 2001.
Posted Aug. 16, 2001.
 |
| South
Africans protest the United States' stance on the upcoming
United Nations World Conference Against Racism, to be
held in Durban later this month (Photo: AFP). |
It
comes as no surprise that delegates in Geneva failed to reach
a compromise on the thorny questions of the Middle East conflict
and reparations for slavery and colonialism being on the agenda
of the upcoming U.N. World Conference Against Racism in Durban
[On Aug. 14, an official with the South African Foreign Ministry
said the question of Zionism as racism would not be on the agenda.
As of Aug. 15, it was still not clear whether the United States
would attendWPR].
Clearly the United States did not go into this preparatory meeting
with an open mind. For two weeks the United States has been
saying it will not participate in the conference unless these
two issues are removed form the agenda. The United States also
indicated that if it does not get its way, it is unlikely to
contribute to financing the conference.
This means that South Africa, as the host, may pick up the entire
tabpossibly more than ZAR100 million [US$12 million].
The United States' uncompromising approach clearly kills any
prospect of finding common ground between delegates with opposing
viewpoints.
It is to the eternal credit of African delegations, their Arab
counterparts, and those from Islamic countries that they have
refused to be bullied by the all-powerful Uncle Sam. It would
have been a travesty of justice if African delegates had allowed
the United States to use bully-boy tactics to get its way.
No matter what Africa's critics say, the Durban conference will
be meaningless if reparations for slavery [and] colonialism
are not on the agenda.
It is also a sad commentary on leaders like U.S. Secretary of
State Colin Powell and U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan who,
being black, ought to have a better understanding of why Africans
throughout the world are demanding an unqualified apology for
slavery and colonialism. People of African descent would have
expected Powell and Annan to be in the forefront of those campaigning
for slavery to be a major topic at the conference.
Slavery was not only a crime against humanity and against our
people. It was worse than the Jewish holocaust in Nazi Germany.
Millions of our people perished in slave ships, were subjected
to the most inhumane treatment by slave masters, and killed
in their new countries.
Today, the United States and Western European countries are
rich as a result of the slave trade and colonialism. People
of African origin are right to demand an apology from the descendants
of slave masters and they are right to call for reparations.
The refusal by the United States and its allies to acknowledge
their guilt is revealing, for it shows that, as in the past,
they are not ready to accept Africans as equals.
If the United States and its allies are so arrogant and petty
over a matter where their guilt is beyond question, can Africans
trust them to lend a helping hand in making the New
African Initiative succeed? The fight against racism, xenophobia
and intolerance can be speedily resolved if rich countries like
the United States contribute their enormous resources.
But these countries must not be allowed to hold this important
conference [hostage]. If the United States [boycotts the conference],
the show must go on, because racism is a bigger issue than even
the most powerful country on earth.
Disclaimer: Articles republished on Worldpress.org
represent the opinions of the author alone and are not necessarily
a reflection of the views of World Press Review, its
editors, or The Stanley Foundation.
|
|
|