Other
|
Resources |
Links open in new window. okmemory.com: Memory upgrade for Dell servers, Apple laptops Laptop Batteries Camcorder Batteries Home Health Care Supplies by Healthcare Supply Pros Car Insurance Quotes – Autoinsurancequotes.net Bad Credit Loans Get cash advance loan in 1 hour. |
Beijing China Daily (state-run), Nov. 2: Recently, the Upper House of Japan’s Parliament gave a final nod to a controversial bill that enables Japan to dispatch military forces and vessels to provide rearguard logistical support to the U.S. army in the antiterrorism war. Japan’s willingness to contribute to the anti-terrorism war is positive since terrorism is posing a serious threat to all human beings. But its enlarged role in the military field has hit a nerve with the consideration of its history of aggression. Despite the loudly trumpeted pledge to contribute to anti-terrorism, the motivations “behind the scene” for passing the bill should not be neglected.
—Zhang Xia
Dar es Salaam Rai (Swahili-language weekly), Oct. 25-31: The U.S.-led attacks have run concurrently with concerted diplomatic efforts to whip up support for the war against terrorism. For President Bush, it has been like being born again.
Dubai Khaleej Times (independent, English-language), Nov. 7: The intensity of bombing in Afghanistan is a...pointer that the U.S.-led alliance lacks a clear strategy to deal with the issue of terrorism....Osama is no longer the main target, but [rather] Taliban leaders, who have resisted every effort to bribe them into abandoning their supreme leader Mullah Omar and to raise the banner of revolt.
Havana Juventud Rebelde (communist youth), Nov. 9: The systematic carpet bombing of the Taliban positions that defend the cities of Mazar-i-Sharif and the capital Kabul—including explosions powerful enough to kill everything within square kilometers and resembling tactical nuclear arms in their destructive potential—are little more than battering rams so that the incompetent forces of the Northern Alliance can take these cities, kick the Taliban out of power, and thus deliver a victory that will satisfy the expectations of U.S. public opinion.
Karachi Dawn (centrist), Nov. 6: The round-the-clock bombing of Afghan cities by the Anglo-U.S. warplanes, and the admission by the U.S. defense secretary and British prime minister that it was almost impossible to capture Osama bin Laden or to occupy Kandahar should bring home to Washington the bitter truth that there was no instant military solution to the complex political problems in Afghanistan. It was perhaps owing to this realization that diplomatic initiatives have been made in Islamabad with a view to forging a broad-based coalition of all persuasions in that embattled country.
Accra Statesman (independent liberal weekly), Oct. 30: Conventional military action is not the answer to this 21st-century menace to civilization. The killers who boarded those planes on Sept. 11, like the senders of the anthraxgrams, were not in Afghanistan at all. This new enemy does not wear [a] uniform and belongs to no state, but he can bring a superpower to its knees. To try and defeat him with B52s and cruise missiles is as ludicrous as confronting tanks with bows and arrows. The conditions that breed terrorism will have to be transformed.
Stockholm Dagens Nyheter (liberal), Nov. 5: The debaters, who as a rule were wrong about both communism and the Gulf War, are again complaining about the United States in the European media. At the same time, Bin Laden’s people are secretly mulling over completely different scenarios. After Sept. 11, the thoughtless people in the West still refuse to comprehend that the creativity of these mass murderers is much greater than their own.
—Per Ahlmark
| RESOURCES |
|
Sell my car Car Service Used Cars |

Web-Exclusive Alert
Sign up for both our web exclusive e-mail newsletter and our indispensable World Headlines.
![]()
|
| Copyright © 1997-2012 Worldpress.org. All Rights Reserved.
|