Middle East
|
Resources |
Links open in new window. okmemory.com: Memory upgrade for Dell servers, Apple laptops Laptop Batteries Camcorder Batteries Loans Personal loans and small business loans available Home Health Care Supplies by Healthcare Supply Pros Car Insurance Quotes – Autoinsurancequotes.net Bad Credit Loans Get cash advance loan in 1 hour. |
The theorists of this type of heroic behavior do not even refrain from clearly enunciating their views. If necessary, to protest against or justify the absence of competition in one constituency, they will compare elections to buying a kilo of pears at the market, saying that if you must buy a kilo of pears and that is all there is, then you will buy the kilo of pears.
This process has sadly spread to the national broadcasting body. Thanks to the lack of private television and radio in the country, the body has given itself an exclusive role, a position inevitably strengthened by the ban on satellite viewing. This has given its administrators the sense that they are the ultimate victors in the news and information arena. In the fourth parliamentary elections of 1371 (1992), biased news and publicity by Voice and Vision [Iran’s official radio and television network] against the left-wing faction, alongside the supervisory process, led to a right-wing victory. That experience may have prompted the illusion that people still turn to these media alone to receive news.
This writer does not intend to prove the claim by reformers that the actions of the state broadcasting body serve conservative aims but believes that even if true, it would yield the opposite of desired results. But one can confidently assume that in the transfer of news and information, the views dominating the state broadcasting body are decisive. On Sunday, the speaker of Parliament [the reformist Mehdi Karubi] leveled some strongly worded criticism against the Guardian Council and, recalling the comments of one council member about Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, he asked him, are you loyal to Islam? He also asked the authors of the constitution to come out and clearly declare their opinion on the scope of Guardian Council supervision. State television did not broadcast a single word of these comments by the Majlis [parliament] speaker in any of its news program.
Likewise it gave full and extensive coverage to statements by the Guardian Council secretary [Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati], which included accusations against the president and certain Cabinet members, but it only briefly reported the Cabinet response to these accusations and the rejection of remarks by Jannati.
Perhaps some will think that in this, like other contests, victory belongs to the party that is left alone in the arena. But the presence of numerous domestic and foreign news channels and media makes this supposition so unreasonable and unreal as to make it unnecessary to make much of an effort to refute it.
And yet concern for media that must be the most secure and credible source of news for the public in critical conditions makes any indifference to this behavior unjustified. Today, expedient supervision has meant that in two provinces where a deputy must be elected for the Assembly of Experts, only one candidate is approved, who, as the speaker of Parliament said, would win and enter the Assembly of Experts even if only his wife and children voted for him. But no type of supervision can limit the people’s access to news and information.
While any victory by Iran’s media in competition with the world’s media giants will remain a dream, if our national media are at least to take part in such a contest, a fundamental review of some of its practices is inevitable.
| RESOURCES |
|
Sell my car Car Service Used Cars |

Web-Exclusive Alert
Sign up for both our web exclusive e-mail newsletter and our indispensable World Headlines.
![]()
|
| Copyright © 1997-2012 Worldpress.org. All Rights Reserved.
|