Click
an area of the map for world news.
:
|

From the
December 2001 issue of
World Press Review
(VOL. 48, No. 12)
Globalization Transformed
From High Ground, a Hard
Fall
Sibylle
Hamann and Otmar Lahodynsky, Profil (weekly newsmagazine),
Vienna, Austria, Sept. 17, 2001.
 |
| A
lone protester faces a police cordon during the G8 summit in
Genoa in July, 2001 (Photo: AFP). |
The demonstrators
in Genoa do not have much to do with terrorismand certainly
nothing at all with Islamic fundamentalists. Nevertheless, the
most important social movement of the last several decades has
fallen, since Sept. 11, into a strategic trap. Their basic critique
of the injustices of the international economic system fell
on fertile ground. But the image of the enemy that they conjured
up was all too similar to the enemies of the Muslim terrorists:
America in general, Western financial institutions, the military-industrial
complex, and NATO in particular.
Hans-Peter Martin, author of the best-selling book The Global
Trap, sees his ideas confirmed by the apocalypse in New York
City. American policy can declare bankruptcy after the
attacks, he says. Neoliberalism collapsed with the
World Trade Center. But in saying that, Martin expressed
a point that scarcely any Arab government would dare to raise:
that the hatred directed at America was its own fault. During
the first decade of globalization, which was carried out under
U.S. hegemony, we witnessed the greatest redistribution of assets
in the peacetime history of mankind, Martin said. This
must have consequences. Only hungry people train to become suicide
pilots.
But to maintain such a position after Sept. 11 obviously puts
one in a fix. This must have been a rude awakening. Not long
ago, the meetings of the World Bank and International Monetary
Fund were still on the agenda, scheduled for the end of September,
and anti-globalists had their demonstrations planned. Sympathies
had shifted toward the demonstrators; world leaders had come
to realize that they would have to sit down and talk to remain
credible.
But with the attacks on the heart of American power, the roles
of good and evil have shifted 180 degrees. It is true that Hans-Peter
Martin, employing bellicose language, sought to undermine compassion
for the American people. If the United States now undertakes
a campaign of revenge, the punishment will only create new martyrs,
he warned. And if the Europeans appear to be nothing more
than useful auxiliaries to U.S. strategies, then Airbuses will
soon come crashing into the pompous new chancellery in Berlin.
But the devilishly unscrupulous villains have become, overnight,
the victims, who will get away, for a long time to come, with
anything. There will be no anti-capitalist demonstration in
Washington. The terrorists have taken anti-Americanism from
the anti-globalization movements vocabularyand brought
it into ill repute.
|
|
|