Click
an area of the map for world news.

|

Arab
Press Rejects Bin Laden's Call to Arms
Jihad for Whom?
Uthman
Mirghani, Al-Sharq al-Awsat (Saudi-owned), London, England,
Oct. 24, 2001
Translated and posted to worldpress.org,
Nov. 19, 2001
 |
| Protesters
from Indonesia's Islamic Youth Movement outside the Presidential
Palace in Jakarta, Nov. 19, 2001 (Photo: AFP). |
Recently, some isolated voices have called for jihad. In fact, these voices are not doing Islam a service.
They are asking Muslims to take actions that will cause the gravest harm
to Islam and to Muslims across the world. But we must question these calls so
that the voices of the demagogues do not eclipse the voice
of reason. What jihad are they calling for
and for whose sake and for what purpose? Does the Taliban regime
represent the true image of Islam that people must defend and
fight for? Are the practices of Al Qaeda organizationkilling innocent people, and carrying out acts of terrorism
that cause the gravest harm to Muslims and tarnish the reputation
of Islamat all related to Islam so that some people make calls to
defend this organization?
It is clear that some organizations and individuals are either
deceived or are themselves trying to deceive people in the service of an extremist minority. This minority
harms Islam and seeks to cause divisions among the people,
create unrest, and destabilize the [Middle East] out of a hunger for power. Their goals are political, not religious.
Isn't this Taliban regime the same regime that the Muslim ulema [teachers]
criticized on many occasions prior to the Sept. 11 incidents
for some of its practices? Didn't the ulema view the Taliban's practices as alien to
Islam and its luminous message of tolerance and civilization?
Isn't the Taliban the same regime that is benefiting from the narcotics
trade, that prohibits the education of girls, and shuts its doors
to any practices that preserve the people's right to a dignified
life?
It is the duty of those who claim to be calling for jihad to
defend Islam by ridding it of those who harm its shining image
of tolerance and justice. It is their duty to do what might
benefit, not harm, Islam and Muslims throughout the world and
stay away from things that jeopardize the interests of Muslims
and endanger the Islamic community in Europe, the United States,
and Africa.
There is no doubt that what happened in New York and Washington
on Sept. 11 was a reckless, irresponsible, and senseless act.
It had nothing to do with Islam and it did not render any service
to religion or Muslims. Instead, it caused the gravest harm
to Muslims, tarnished the reputation of Islam, and placed Muslims
in the position of having to defend their religion, to explain and justify themselves to the rest of the world.
In addition, the terrorist attacks have given extremists and
racists a chance to attack Islam, taking advantage of some practices
that have nothing to do with the glorious religion.
If any jihad is required today, it must focus on explaining
the fundamental justice of Islamic faith and law, and their tolerant message. Those who have tarnished Islam's image, and in so doing, have harmed
Muslims must be confronted. Whoever assists an individual in causing injustice
is practicing a greater act of injustice. And whoever tries
to justify a mistake is committing a graver mistake. The best
jihad is to utter the truth, and the best defense of Islam is
to confront those who exploit it to justify practices that have nothing
to do with Islam's essential message of justice and tolerance, who tarnish its image, who undermine its message, and who cause the gravest harm to Muslims everywhere.
|
|
|